Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For those interested, there is a pending discussion to change the above guideline. Cbl62 (talk) 23:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for 1980 National League West tie-breaker game

[edit]

1980 National League West tie-breaker game has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes in Team season pages

[edit]

Taking a look through, I noticed the Boston Red Sox team season pages, have "GB" in the infoboxes. This isn't included on other teams' season pages infobox. GoodDay (talk) 01:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really see the need for that in the infobox. Spanneraol (talk) 12:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've deleted the "GB" bit, from all the Boston Americans/Red Sox team season pages' infobox. GoodDay (talk) 14:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

World Series program image

[edit]

I notice that 2024 World Series (and others before it) has an image of the World Series program cover, but it's non free, with the claim to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question. But World Series' pages already display the series' logo, so it seems excessive to claim the program is also needed for ID purposes. Am I missing something? —Bagumba (talk) 10:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Team graphics in baseball season pages

[edit]

Howdy. It appears that @Frontsfan2005: is adding 'team graphics' to baseball season pages (I've noticed the season pages of the International League for example). I realize that WP:BASEBALL supports the inclusion of "team maps". But adding "team graphics" seems pointless, as it's mostly decorative & only gets repeated later, in the stats section. Should they be deleted, the team graphics. GoodDay (talk) 18:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Oakland Athletics#Requested move 4 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 17:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

President of baseball operations

[edit]

Seeking input from this community as to if we've reached a point where it makes sense to split out President of baseball operations as an independent article, rather than only being discussed in the General manager (baseball) article. Earlier today I created a REDIRECT for president of baseball operations, pointing to the relevant section of the GM article. Looking at the content there, along with the number of people who hold the role (e.g. Dave Dombrowski and Jed Hoyer), or who have held the role (e.g. Theo Epstein and Larry Beinfest), I think it makes sense to split out the content, but wanted to check with others here first. Dmoore5556 (talk) 04:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it basically "team president"? GoodDay (talk) 04:27, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is not. Team president is a broader role, with both baseball and non-baseball responsibilities, whereas the president of baseball operations has final authority over baseball decisions, being superior to the team's GM. Dave Dombrowski is a good example, currently with the Phillies and previously with the Red Sox; he's not been the president of either of those teams. Some teams have people in both president and president of baseball operations roles, one current example being the Boston Red Sox with Sam Kennedy as president and Craig Breslow as Chief Baseball Officer (the Red Sox' wording for the president of baseball operations role). Dmoore5556 (talk) 04:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For now, I'd say don't split. WP:PAGEDECIDE mentions:

Sometimes, a notable topic can be covered better as part of a larger article, where there can be more complete context that would be lost on a separate page ... Sometimes, several related topics, each of them similarly notable, can be collected into a single page, where the relationships between them can be better appreciated than if they were each a separate page

My understanding is that there's currently no prototype organization structure. In the grand scheme of things, the president of baseball operations title is WP:RECENTISM. What's more encyclopedic is explaining the traditional GM responsibilities in relation to the new ones e.g. analytics, salary management, investments, etc. and explain how new positions might overlap or been usurped from traditional GM. It would also be cleaner if General manager (baseball) trimmed down on the typical WP:EXAMPLEFARM. —Bagumba (talk) 05:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]